Do you also think that of the original 7 gTLDs (.com, .edu, .gov, .int, .mil, .net, and .org)?
It's arguably defensible to have a limited number of non-geographic TLDs. "Dot com" was an aesthetic as much as a technical decision. I wonder though, if .com/net/org had never existed, we would have a different sense of aesthetic around domain names, and there's no reason to think that it would be any better or worse than what we have now.