> If not, then you'd need to organize a referendum and let the population itself decide on a one person, one vote basis.
Our founders smartly chose against direct democracy. The more I look around, the more right I see they were.
Our founders smartly chose against direct democracy. The more I look around, the more right I see they were.
Do you know the traditional method of cutting a cake in two perfectly balanced parts? Person A gets to cut it in two however they want. Person B chooses which slice goes to whom. Is it any wonder Person A dislikes it, and would pretty much prefer to both cut it and select which slice goes to whom?