Using this victim/perpetrator language dilutes those terms into meaninglessness, which does real disservice to all the actual human victims of abuse out there.
This is as dumb as Toyota banning you from swearing at your car.
Wouldn’t emotional abuse require both a perpetrator and victim?
Be comprehensive, mostly positive and straight forward, especially in opening specs and base .mds. Using this tech is a responsibility because it can do a lot of stuff that you don't expect it to. Telling it "NEVER FUCKING GUESS", it going to increase that possibility because its an extremely strong and extremely ambiguous prompt.
>telling an AI to "never fucking guess" is stupid and abusive.
This is literally no different from the (numerous) software comments that contain profanity.
>Thinking its fine, is failing to add together the mindset that would generate such a prompt. Its a mindset of someone upset, frustrated
Upset? Frustrated? Again, no different from writing a software comment that contains profanity. ;)
In terms of the statement "never fucking guess": How does an AI _know_ what a guess is and what a guess isn't? Write me that function without infinitely looping context. Its a disaster of a prompt which has an unhealthy attitude as well as a tragic anthropomorphisation of the model.
> Their mindset is healthier than yours, because they realize AI isn't alive.
You're wilfully missing my point. Its not about "the AI having feelings" its about the operator having issues and as a consequence building an alignment issue into their output and causing problems. If you stack these sorts of prompts headless in yolo mode into capable models then you're asking for trouble.