Yes, it is a deeply unserious list.
I dislike LLMs, but if a bug is a bug, then I will fix it, typically without complaint. That is enough to get added to this list. The "curators" demand you accost reporters for any mention of LLM usage.
I dislike LLMs, but if a bug is a bug, then I will fix it, typically without complaint. That is enough to get added to this list. The "curators" demand you accost reporters for any mention of LLM usage.
If someone reports a bug to you and says that they used AI to find it, then what are the options? If you fix the bug you get the tainted status because you "accepted the use of AI for finding bugs or security issues" so what's the alternative? Leaving the bug in your code? Patch it, but also send an angry reply to the person who submitted it telling them to never do that again? How does that help your project?
Functionally, this just makes the "Condones LLM Ingestion" category entirely useless. That still leaves tags like "Vibecoded" or "Gen AI 'Art'" tags useful, but it pretty much guarantees that people will be put off and dismissive of the entire effort. Extremism to the point of absurdity only hurts their cause.