Tell me: when someone says that the shit hit the fan, do you furiously start looking around for actual shit?
Tell me: when someone says that the shit hit the fan, do you furiously start looking around for actual shit?
2) You jump in: "how dare you not accept this obviously-true claim at face value, why are you AI doomers always insinuating that these claims are false and demanding evidence?!".
3) I comment taking the claim at face value.
4) You jump in: "idiot, how stupid are you to take the claim at face value, it's extremely obvious to everyone here that it's not meant literally".
Well if we all agree it's completely unbeleivable if taken literally, can we now have your permission to ask about the reality behind the statement? "if 'enterprise scale' is not intended to mean 'enterprise scale', what scale is the person actually talking about?
Absolutely nothing you're saying is in good faith. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
So, no: you don't have my permission. You haven't earned it.
And your dragging the conversation off topic, turning it into personal attacks, redefining what words mean, refusing to address the point, flip-flopping your position 180 degrees, refusing to acknowledge that you did that, turning it personal again, has all been good faith positive contribution, has it?