From a few examples or opinions you draw a faulty, invalid and incorrect generalisation somehow implying that raising it alone proves it, or that providing a few cherry-picked examples makes the general rule.
I won't entertain you argumenting with this level of bad-faith fallacies, I just mention it is noticed and discarded as absurd - you just don't throw "every" quantifier without a body of evidence - in this case it would be a list of every topic in every project proving that someone formally linked to "GOS crowd" has commented in it.
Every single one, every single one made by someone tied to the project, because this is exactly your argument, and this is why I called it BS.
Anything less is insufficient because of the weight of the quantifier you decided to use.