Obviously no, as I haven't hardened my system for that. You made a claim that "adversaries have never existed inside of the systems that we hoped to secure in the first place" and I gave you two examples that show why that claim is ridiculous.
> It's a start, but now you're just pushing the fallibility up into extensive policy writing. You have to fully audit and trust every endpoint that's been granted access.
We're talking about is trillion dollar companies. Outbound DPI is just one method. There are lots of tools and techniques available to mitigate the behavior that has people upset.
No security is perfect, and aggressive hardening takes time and resources, but it's certainly within reach of a company that has the resources of a frontier lab. People are cranky because it appears that the labs have been lazy. It's not the unsolved problem that you're making it out to be.