If you need thst money back at some point it makes much more sense to tax the sale or purchase of the property because nobody living there is affected until that sale actually happens.
If you need thst money back at some point it makes much more sense to tax the sale or purchase of the property because nobody living there is affected until that sale actually happens.
And make the house unsellable? That's the absolute opposite of what society should want, which is land repeatedly being repurposed for the best and highest use.
The answer is that land should be publicly owned and people should pay land rents. If you can't pay the land rents, there should be a publicly subsidized (temporary, until end of natural life at most) reverse mortgage that allows the owner of the house to pay the land rents with their house equity.
Then you sell the house and move somewhere cheaper, as is normal in any place that doesn't let you externalize "I can't afford the cost of living no more".
Hope you didn't ban housing developments to keep prices high, or fail to ensure economic diversity in different areas instead of outsourcing everything, or you'd be in some real trouble.
Or maybe you’re saying all the homes increase in value by 3x and your income didn’t keep up? Clearly many people did see their incomes increase if there is a market for such homes…