See, perspectives. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ensuring that people have the right idea is why I do care about correct categorization, attribution, and phrasing. People readily twist way clearer things than what you wrote.
I'll keep that trick, it sounds like a nice way to be always right :-).
Right or wrong is all relative to a segmentation. You don't discover who's right or wrong through debate, you discover whether you can agree or not, and why. Formal logic sidesteps this by definining a common ground up front.
I'm committed to my position, and I do think it is "right". But that doesn't necessarily mean much. Same for you. If this was more commonly understood, I think that would indeed be nice. See also the "agree to disagree" you issued up top. This is what that actually means.