I'm referring to the fact it won - which would imply something about the quality level of the AI entry.
Quality and veracity are independent (orthogonal) axes, but we are used to them being correlated, so some people conflate the two.
A knock-off Chanel handbag likely won’t be as good quality as the original, but it could be even better! Even so, it wouldn’t be authentic.
You can make an ultra high quality fake check and deposit it and yet it will still bounce because it turns out the quality is irrelevant if it isn't real.
It also didn't win. By definition a disqualified entry is not a winning entry. That is what the entire article is about, if you read it! The winning entry is here: https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2026-small-world-i...
My friend, it is the heart of the point I was raising. On my thread. So explain to me how the topic I raised about the quality is irrelevant to what I am saying?
> It also didn't win.
It won first place:
> The company has stripped an entry to its Small World In Motion competition of its first place prize.
In order to be stripped of a prize one must have first won the prize.
Are you an idiot or a troll? I can't tell.