Hacker News Reader

Comment by seemaze | Hacker News Reader

Processed food ingredients in the US are highly subsidized by the US government. The resulting processed foodstuffs are shelf stable, widely distributed, and trounce local options in the market place through sheer scale. More often than not, "real food" == "health food" == "luxury item". It's unfortunate and unhealthy.

View on HN

Why are they subsidised?I mean what if the rationale, is it through lobbying or as some policy decision

I assume that shelf stable foods are easier for people who live in food deserts or have uneven incomes to maintain. If you live an hour away from a grocery store, fressh produce becomes less of a priority. Honestly having to shop less often than weekly, makes you consider shelf stable foods more. Being low income, makes you consider them just because it's cheaper and I think it's reasonable for the government to prefer to finance food that can last a long time since recipients of the food might not be able to acquire it often.

I also think people forget that there are several regions in the US where keeping a couple weeks of food on hand is not just a choice, it's a realistic smart decision because of the common occurrence of natural disasters.

The majority of people in the US live more than an hour away for a grocery store?

I think >90% of people live in an urban area where that is not the case so I don’t think it would make sense to massively shape policy for those few that live in the country.

Actually (again n=1) the people that I met that lived in the country had vastly better and cheaper access to unprocessed food than those in urban areas.

I reckon it’s more a culture thing than anything based on “cold logic”

> Processed food ingredients in the US are highly subsidized by the US government.

The government subsidizes the crops used in processed foods, specifically corn, soybeans, wheat, sugar crops.

But these crops also supply animal feed, fuel, exports, and ordinary foods.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com