> It would be like having a proxy for nytimes or cnn
It's a much grayer area, considering NYTimes owns their content and x does not own the content they serve. I think this question deserves zealous representation.
It's a much grayer area, considering NYTimes owns their content and x does not own the content they serve. I think this question deserves zealous representation.
Do they not? And if they wanted to, couldn't they, pretty trivially, with a ToC change?
Seems like a bad place for them to be, given the whole argument of “you can’t sue us for what other people said on our platform, that’s not our speech!” but that seems complicated and IANAL.
Fyi this is illegal at least in the EU.
> What does X's User Retention of Content Ownership clause do?
> The clause states: “You retain your rights to any Content, including anything referenced therein, you submit, input, create, generate, post, or display on or through the Services. What's yours is yours — you own your Content.”
https://conductatlas.com/platform/x/x-terms-of-service/provi...