The article is very much making up conclusions not present in the work cited. There were no "wipe outs" or "total turnovers".
Probably some sort of jingoist advocating ethnic cleansing writing articles like this.
Probably some sort of jingoist advocating ethnic cleansing writing articles like this.
> 100 ancient genomes show repeated population turnovers in Neolithic Denmark
Of course there are still parts of the hunter gatherer genome present, but we still have neanderthal and Denisovan genome present
They’re often sensational and frequently inaccurate or misleading, but often the research they cite is worthwhile.