Sorry, only saw this now.

Mainly was alluding to the way actual research (e.g. J-Space) is presented in communication by labs the doing doing said research. We have had multiple instances (like with J-Space) of massive deltas between the actual findings and the industry statements. The former, factual, interesting and muted, the latter hype beyond any rational basis, even inaccurate or irresponsible on occasion.

Then there was Jensen Huang stating GPT-6 Astra is AGI. AGI can be whatever one wants, seemingly, but I'd be very surprised if the same person didn't claim something similar about future model releases (not that those are also AGI, but that does are finally AGI, thus erasing the claim on GPT-6 Astra).