Unless you think those fields were scientifically rigorous until they decided to adopt his ideas?
Maybe you just disagree with the existence of “male gaze”
I think maybe the feminist movements adopted his beliefs and repeated them infinitely to the extent that they've become as facts without any scientific basis. Regardless, I hear people regurgitating Berger-like beliefs in art museums around the world.
Male gaze, sure. (That's not Berger's btw. It's Mulvey using Berger beliefs. Great example.)
The idea that we can draw much knowledge about the owner of the painting of a fat woman, simply from the painting, is just not based in any science.
Hopefully that's more clear.