You don't. This is demonstrated by
>Claude Code CLI ... is there anyone in the world that knows how that spaghetti machine works
Having a very active, and happy user base.
Now this a simplistic view, and I think even heavily AI first dev teams still glance at the diff to make sure things aren't going too awry or ask questions. But the concept "spaghetti code" and "optimized for human understanding" are assumptions being revisited entirely in 2026.
EDIT: also, from the software engineer perspective, it is an order of magnitude more tedious to maintain software projects that lack quality, consistency, or standards. If I could measure the effect of AI vibe-coding in terms of personal pain, I would say it makes software development more painful when code is not well thought-out. There is a way to use AI responsibly, but I see more often people taking shortcuts and throwing "engineering" out the window. It's possible to ship quality with AI, but that's not the path of least resistance.
This may be a case of "you'll see more posts from people who are complaining than from the people who are busy using it." As a semi-relevant comparison: go on Reddit/Twitter any time there's a Fortnite update and you'll see and endless sea of complaints, yet the game is still being played by ridiculous numbers of people.
The kind of outfit that's going to go all in on Claude is also likely to punish "negativity about AI".