I am not making anything more difficult for anyone, this type of defense of your precious AI is though. You should personally go tell the kids in Memphis that are breathing the air from Elon's generators about the percentage of global electricity AI uses
In you most recent comment you manage to accuse me of denialism and holding AI to be precious.
Yet the message you responded to contains the text "The reality is that climate change is occurring and it will cause significant impact upon humanity, and many species"
As for AI, I'm not sure if I said anything to suggest I hold AI in high esteem, my argument was strictly related to your inaccuracies and your beliefs that others should cede to your will.
Your last part seems just irrational. I addressed a claim of global impact. Not individual instances of local harm.
Would you ask a car owner to apologise to the families of everyone killed in a car accident? It doesn't make sense.
Read the IEA report for 2025 and 2026. If you find that I have said something inaccurate about the global impact, I would be more than happy to be corrected, I don't want to win an argument here, I want things to move towards the truth.
Just take a breath and think about what you are writing. You are making exaggerated claims and imagining far stronger positions in others than what they say. It's amplifying in both directions.
Phrases like "You should personally go tell the kids..." Is projecting a kind of malice onto others. It is a form of rhetoric that you seem to turn to often. I think you could benefit from reminding yourself that most people do not act out of malice as a matter of course.