Agree but every statement I now read from Anthropic just sounds like marketing bs to me. When they say 20x less and 4x faster they sound like Apple with no real data comparison or any detail at all
Typical anthropic post.
While I think their models are great, and they deserve a lot of props for caring about safety (their interpretability work is great), their public tone just leaves so much to be desired.
Apparently they also don't understand the Streissand effect, given their recent blog posts about GLM 5.3.
At this point I believe they NEVER cared about safety. The CEO doomerism and the whole "slow down the development of AI" far cry is another marketing strategy based off fear