Similarly, "owners are responsible for their pets" doesn't auto-translate into being charged with everything your dog does exactly as if you'd done it yourself.
i think ultimately the company providing said agents should be responsible for not educating their customers and not providing sufficient guardrails.
afaik hacking is illegal, we don’t have specific legal framework for agents per se, but if we say agent is a tool human instructs and operates, then a human is responsible. and if the tool operated outside of it’s stated capabilities or is otherwise faulty, then a manufacturer is responsible, no?
> manufacturer is responsible
How does that work with current open weight LLMs for example?
If your neighbor's property is damaged, it doesn't matter if you did it yourself, or your dog. You're still liable for the cost of repair.