I think that we should reframe how we look at skills and jobs. The legacy market rewards specialists and AI evens out some specialist areas. I am a big believer that we will re-balance the value towards ability to think critically, learn, interact with others and be a generalist. It maybe not for everyone and so people that enjoy being specialists in their craft will have to look for areas where AI/robotics has not caught up yet - maybe construction, farming, logistics.

I believe that at the end of the day the money and wages are a notional exchange of value and that the total pie will stay unchanged, just our overall quality of life would improve and the hierarchy of skills and

I think that as soon as any technology becomes ubiquitous, it becomes cheap. You can probably make an argument about any significant technology being able to dominate the economy if kept in the hands of the few (e.g. what if only one country or one company had electricity?), but looking at the history it has not happened and I do not see a realistic path of this happening with AI.

I don't understand how someone can make an argunent that eliminating unnecessary complexity from the world is not a good thing.