Because to me, it sure looks like you're only here to spread your agenda, and not to have any meaningful conversations.
I'm not sure why you think I'm jumping around between ideas.
> It's not "an agenda", it's a policy position.
No, it's not a policy position, it's an agenda you push. And it's one I've been seeing you push for months, if not years. You never really engage with critical responses, you just keep jumping to the next idea so you can keep pushing your agenda.
Yeah, ok bro.
>>No, it's not a policy position, it's an agenda you push.
I'm not sure how you define the difference. Is it an agenda if you disagree with it?
Doubly so when every argument you regurgitate boils down to the exact same talking points being disseminated through far-right media outlets. What can anyone learn from your comments, that they couldn't get by e.g. opening Breitbart?
It's also notable that there are several accounts in this thread doing the exact same thing.
> Lol. Ask people in Crowborough and Piddington
Awww, you guys have stopped citing Luton then?
‘I feel perfectly safe’: white Lutonians on the town’s supposed no-go zones - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/oct/08/luton-white-...
that's the way, just move onto another UK backwater and claim that as the new hotbed of brown people plotting against the King.
I have a rape gang enquiry report you should read.
>>Awww, you guys have stopped citing Luton then?
Not sure what "guys" you are referring to. I'm referring to the fact that dropping 1,250 male asylum seekers from countries with a completely different culture (such that need to be given brochures saying women need to consent to sex) next to a village with a population of 350 is one of the most appalling ideas ever.