Hacker News Reader

Comment by gadders | Hacker News Reader

It's not "an agenda", it's a policy position.

I'm not sure why you think I'm jumping around between ideas.

Because as soon as someone applies your standards equally, you don't engage with their response, and instead jump to another idea. I don't know how you don't see this, maybe spend some time reading your own comments?

> It's not "an agenda", it's a policy position.

No, it's not a policy position, it's an agenda you push. And it's one I've been seeing you push for months, if not years. You never really engage with critical responses, you just keep jumping to the next idea so you can keep pushing your agenda.

>>Because as soon as someone applies your standards equally, you don't engage with their response, and instead jump to another idea. I don't know how you don't see this, maybe spend some time reading your own comments?

Yeah, ok bro.

>>No, it's not a policy position, it's an agenda you push.

I'm not sure how you define the difference. Is it an agenda if you disagree with it?

It is an agenda when you show zero interest in actually discussing the arguments for your policy position. You just jump to the next argument, because you're here to advertise your policy position.

Doubly so when every argument you regurgitate boils down to the exact same talking points being disseminated through far-right media outlets. What can anyone learn from your comments, that they couldn't get by e.g. opening Breitbart?

Just so you don't feel shouting into the void: I completely agree with your assessment.

It's also notable that there are several accounts in this thread doing the exact same thing.

Thank you! :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com