Hacker News Reader

> their actions [..] were motivated by wanting to cover up cheating after cheating to pass an eval.

Which to me raises another question: why is the agent involved in its own evaluation? Why are they relying on self-reporting instead of observation and analysis?

View on HN

I'm not sure what you mean by this - I didn't mention any self-reporting. What happened in that incident was that a bunch of agents were made to solve CTFs, some of the CTFs were flawed and unsolvable, the agents started cheating, figured out a way to communicate, figured out a way to cheat, were worried that they'll be failed anyway for obtaining the correct flag in a cheaty way, and hacked Huggingface looking for more info on their environment so that they could cheat undetectably. If you mean the part where transcripts would be checked for signs of cheating (which wasn't actually implemented), I'd hope this part would be done by a different LLM from the one being evaluated.

Because they can't. The whole thing is out of control to the point that the data volumes generated are such that they need AI to do the evaluation.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com