People keep saying this with 0 proof other than the INDEXING "bot" trafick being down on cloudflare dashboard
So they do have some proof?
In that context it's pretty obvious "bots" are referring to disinformation or "troll" bots, not bots doing indexing/scraping.
So he has some proof? So the jury is still out, so this is controversial, right?
People who measure traffic to sites supposedly plagued by russian bots (the ones we care about here: trolls, disinformation, etc.) saw absolutely no dip in traffic
I mean, we can use a little common sense and assume that there were fish in the river, right? We'd be foolish not to.
Do you think that if tomorrow a Google data center goes down the NSA spyware, botnets and other online campaigns go down? I very much doubt it
I don't think any of this is controversial. Bloviate all you want about Google and rivers or whatever the fuck, I think we're getting into the weeds and really losing the plot here.
> We can use a little common sense
What you read:
> This assumption is irrefutable proof!
Thanks bud.