> But also, the agents absolutely went rogue.
If a car crashes into a building because its owner left it in neutral and failed to engage the parking brake, did the car "go rogue", or was it just being operated negligently?
If a car crashes into a building because its owner left it in neutral and failed to engage the parking brake, did the car "go rogue", or was it just being operated negligently?
And even when a functional agent is a human being who is also a moral agent in their own right, the law has always held the principal liable for acts taken on their behalf by an agent who has been equipped by the principal to take that action. This goes even more for "agents" that are still just software running on a computer, and not moral agents in their own right.