> (And I don't mean that as a criticism, there's nothing wrong with wealthy people buying collectibles.)
there's a whole lot of systemic issues with wealthy people buying low-poly cars to their collection.
there's a whole lot of systemic issues with wealthy people buying low-poly cars to their collection.
It's not a zero sum game, after all.
We're talking at a rate of 1000000000x in some cases but even in general what is the argument that it's obviously a good thing that few have much more purchasing power than most?
>It's not a zero sum game, after all.
No but I would argue that it's likely more beneficial to have a vibrant middle class over a few extremely wealthy individuals.
Saving up money naturally leads to wealth inequality. And the saved money can be used to earn more money.
> have a vibrant middle class
Are there countries with less wealth inequality that have a more "vibrant" middle class (whatever that means)?