yes a weight loss drug for a country that is over 70% overweight is absolutely the same as a psychoactive drug with well-understood cognitive side effects and abuse risk, a perfect analogy

A take you knew was so dumb that you had to create a new account to post it.

There is a gold rush happening where every health influencer, telehealth prescriber, and even aging services provider (as is the case with some of these study authors) is trying to push this medication for a wider audience.

Medical marijuana was different, though. The negatives were known medically before and after. The push was almost entirely political and on social media. The few places medical marijuana were medically pushed were either for highly specific applications or as a harm reduction measure: Either as an alternative for patients who demanded opioids (medical marijuana isn’t actually a viable substitute for opioids in severe high level pain, but it’s common for patients to demand to be prescribed something “stronger” for lesser conditions and there was a real problem with opioid over prescription at the time) or from the sector of medicine that sees that patients are seeking out drugs anyway and thought this was a better way to control and monitor it. The way it worked out in practice became a laughable loophole where anyone who wants a card can pay $100 for a meeting with a prescriber who will give leading questions until you say the right things to get the card, which wasn’t even what the original medical marijuana proposals were about.

In the medical and research world, there was never an illusion that marijuana was actually entirely harmless and without drawbacks, except for fringe papers and a few politically motivated researchers.