And assuming everyone you care about is able to get documents, do you think they shouldn't be allowed to access information or means of communication anonymously?
The argument about people who can't prove their identity is a distraction. The argument should be why are we requiring anyone to do that in the first place?
Well, the way Labour have been going recently, maybe it is a far right dog whistle; they're the buggers barking at it...
The fact is, Yoti and these other companies are British big tech, and the argument over free speech vs. censorship is really just US and British big tech trying to compete in the surveillance capitalism space.