In the spirit of wanting this thread to be more productive: I would like to see ~80%+ of the West Bank settlers shoved back into Israel as part of a peace deal and the infrastructure given as reparations.
That's not a comment on that article though (not that there's anything wrong with it). The comments on the flagged post seem quite reasonable.
Why do you support for the arbitrary number (20%) of the brutal, illegal occupiers involved in the countless, documented human right abuses and murders to remain on the land they stole and have absolutely no right to occupy?
Because the Palestinians are many decades late in accepting a two-state peace deal and their bargaining position isn't getting any better.
Because even moving 80% of West Bank settlement population is going to be difficult for Israel to achieve politically and we want the proposal to be something that can be actually achieved because we can see what the alternatives are. And this is with a hypothetical Democrat US president willing to bring ultimatums to an new Israeli President that is to the left of Netanyahu.
If you want to encourage endless conflict over what your vision of justice is then that's your right. But if there's no compromise there's going to be a lot of (mostly Palestinian) blood spilled yet and you should be aware of that.
Israel perpetrated an ethnic cleansing in 1948.
Israel illegally occupied Palestinian territory for decades, enforced apartheid, committed innumerable war crimes, murdered enormous amounts of civilians through the decades and caused total destruction of Gaza as well as many West Bank villages.
Never recognised Palestine even after Palestine recognised Israel (in 1998) and maneuvered to prevent its creation.
Given this and more, I would start by asking at least 120% of the territory back plus substantial reparations.
As for what Israel can achieve politically- I don't think you understand. You will never get anything via political negotiations because Israel has zero interest in giving up anything. The entire "peace process" has always been a farce, used to grant Israel more time to grab what it wants. The only way you're going to get anything is by exercising a substantial force, either economically (crippling sanctions) or via direct military intervention. If you keep treating Israel as a friend or an ally you'll never get anything out if it. Israel is an enemy.
The people holding power there (and that includes e.g. Hamas leaders, PLO leaders, various Israel leaders like from Shas party, or leaders of the settlers) hold part of their power BECAUSE of this conflict. Would the conflict go away, and the area become as boring as e.g. Austria, then their importance would have been reduced.
A powerful group there benefit from the ongoing drama.
You say Israeli leaders would not want peace because it would mean giving up their power. As if the value of what they take wasn't a sufficient incentive enough. They keep stealing because they- themselves, their family or their country- profit handsomely from it.
And you say Hamas leaders wouldn't want to relinquish their power, as if it gave them great privileges. Well, many, most of the Hamas leaders are probably dead, or have had their family killed, their parents and their children are under the rubble of the razed cities- and you think that they want to keep playing this game for the power? Seriously?
And you call this a "drama", in which both sides are equal and fight just because of the ego of their leaders. Would you have called "the ongoing drama" the South-african apartheid? Mandela's 27 years in prison? Maybe the Holocaust too?