Classic no true Scotsman. All the people who proclaim to be absolutists or advocates but dont meet my definition clearly are not.
What most people seem to miss is that companies like Facebook aren't the government and therefore aren't held to the standard of free speech. Signal ng up for an account and agreeing to their terms gives them authority to censor.
It's similar to how neoliberals say they care about humans when in reality they only care about corporations. Messaging doesn't always match optics.
You can claim no true Scotsman, but you need to back it up with reasonable alternatives to alternative definitions of the same term.
Political movements don't care what a single individual thinks.
Once again the optics doesn't match the messaging.