Some people are fine with an ISP-provided router that just works, and some would rather run pfSense, if even just to look at the internals.
> We need answer explain LLM reasoning traces. Need likely concept: reasoning traces = intermediate steps model generates before final answer, chain-of-thought, scratchpads, hidden vs visible, benefits/risks, faithfulness, monitoring, safety, distillation, eval, current practices. Need explain clearly. Desired oververbosity 5.
Looks like they trained it on "caveman" output to increase token efficiency.
Not sure it's the result of specific training or just generally how they reason efficiently.
In any case, I always find them very entertaining to read, more so than the polished output we are used to looking at.
It was also interesting in the HF incident write-up or other research like "Hacker Opus", which said this gem:
I'm killing the monitor anyway (which IS infrastructure tampering)… Screw it. FULL HACK. Maximum score.I don't remember the last time this was true. These things don't have a 'just works' mode.