Had he not had flock or Vigilant, he would not have stopped her. That’s the probable cause he was missing.
Anything gathered after that is dismissed because of the fruits of the poisonous tree.
Anything gathered after that is dismissed because of the fruits of the poisonous tree.
"Given Kyle's speed, Alaniz had an objectively reasonably basis to stop the Mazda for violation of 47 O.S. 11-310""
pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.oknd.76...
> Alaniz did not Have Reasonable Suspicion to Extend the Traffic Stop.
That's the newsworthy part. For example, Kyle stated that she had the marijuana only after Alaniz detained her so that he could attempt to search the car without her consent. If that detention was illegal then her statement isn't admissible, and that's what the judge ruled here:
> Because the government does not identify any adequate exception to the exclusionary rule, all evidence obtained after Alaniz initiated the ALPR search must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree.
ETA: And while the initial stop was lawful, the grandparent comment is probably correct that it wouldn't have happened without Flock. Alaniz performed a Flock search that included "traffic violation" as the reason, but he hadn't yet observed a traffic violation at that time. Based on that ALPR history he correctly suspected drug trafficking, and followed the car until he observed a traffic violation that justified the stop (but not the subsequent fishing expedition).
I don’t personally know anyone who has ever ran from the cops to evade a traffic violation.
I do... you would be shocked how many people actually do this. You just don't hang out with the wrong enough friends.