> You either accept

That is a false dichotomy. Some enumerations have reasons to likely change in the future, others (most) either have no such thing or their changing would be so impactful to the system it needs to be signaled loudly.

That’s really no different than any other type information.

> It's always a tradeoff and you can also always fork or propose your own improved version of the concept

You are the person asserting that the concept as defined is incorrect.