"Why does it matter to you?" Many Claudisms are grating to many people. Annoying is enough of a justification.

For one, say what it does instead of what it doesn't do

"Run Android apps natively on Apple Silicon Macs. Uses translation instead of emulation."

No, slop generally doesn't get the point across efficiently.

It's hard to parse, it's grating, and in addition to the strange language you have to apply additional skepticism due to gross inaccuracy being more likely than in human-written text.

Variety is the Spice of Life

If you run a readability analysis on slop it scores very poorly. LLMs generally continue to be mediocre with the veneer of quality without context to guide them.

Cliches annoyed people before LLMs. There is a whole microgenre of essay ranting about the proliferation of various annoying cliches, bits of jargon, etc. the proliferation of Claude prose is simply rendering certain turns of phrase into annoying cliches, which people are reacting to in the normal way. Cliches also get the point across but nonetheless lots of people find them grating.