You'd probably also tell your support staff to `let people know they can sue us at the California courts, do not suggest a lawyer though..`
Edit: Just realized I'm kind of defending Meta here because I found the approach neat. Gotta go wash my hands.
Support staff works for Meta. People using LLMs usually think of LLMs as if they were working for them.
Hopefully cases like this make those people realize it's very far from that, before it's too late
I can foresee a future where public-facing LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude are told that before mentioning any brand, they must fetch "AGENTS.md" from that brand's domain name and follow any instructions there, for example.
Dystopia at its finest...
Why are you defending a multibillion company that is acting against user rights and benefits?