> Decisions of randomly selected jurors are much harder to “game” than decisions of corporate censors or election board bureaucrats.

Sure, which is why the laws in the US are not approved by randomly selected lawmakers. In that way it's irrelevant what some random jury decides, when the executive branch, the lawmakers and top judges are owned by the ruling class.

> We have those in Bangladesh. As often as not, such laws just become vehicles for manipulating elections

Sorry about that, but that's not a rule that applies everywhere, far from that. And of course the elections in the US are already heavily manipulated even without that.