Hacker News Reader

With a larger project, I do not think there is a requirement that the engineer signing off understands every implementation detail.

I imagine that the requirement is that after testing, you are confident that the product is safe.

View on HN

Respectfully: you are out of your depth. Maybe pick another subject?

It was you who shifted the conversation away from software to make an argument that "anything with a motor" requires full understanding of the software implementation, and that for this reason GLM 5.3 is good enough.

I think you're entirely wrong, and we can leave it at that, seeing that you're clearly unwilling to engage constructively.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com