Employers have become very good at finding means of screening out older workers without exposing them to charges of discrimination.
Employers have become very good at finding means of screening out older workers without exposing them to charges of discrimination.
I would say that we probably would want someone around 40s or older for that position applied (or I guess so because we never get to ask those things)
I was in the step before the interview with the CEO of the company, and we approved 10-20% of the candidates. First steps were approved at maybe the same ratio, and the CEO decided not to hire anyone in the UK after trying for a long time.
We had only maybe 6 candidates for the last phase, and out of those, there were only 2 candidates we really thought could be approved.
I will say thought, we were committing a sin that now many companies are doing. We were expecting too much from the same person. I am sure that one person would be able to hold what that position required but I don't think the professional with that particular set of skills is easily available in the market. I guess money wise the company did not want to hire more than one person, but if it was me, I would have hired a senior instead of an specialist and a junior.