> It's a bit unfair that you only quote "No.", as the full response was:

No, it's entirely fair. There's absolutely no obligation to include the rest of it.

> If someone thinks a feature can be useful

Still unnecessary. Nobody is under any sort of obligation to contribute if they point out limitations of something.

> especially in the era of agentic coding

Agentic coding requires effort, unless you're advocating for slop.