The article should be easy to refute (if it is wrong).
Chainguard broke the embargo being convinced they have the evidence of this being widely exploited already yesterday. Where is it?
Chainguard broke the embargo being convinced they have the evidence of this being widely exploited already yesterday. Where is it?
1: Wiz finds the exploit , begins responsible patching procedure
2: Chainguard,etc gets to know about it, adds some monitoring on top of their patches.
3: OpenAI being happy for the upcoming publicitiy starts an automated run to _count_ vulnerable instances for _marketing_ purposes.
4: Chainguard interprets it as wild exploitation and pulls the trigger early.
> I wouldn't be surprised
yeah i am not surprised you're not surprised. you seem to have already made up your mind. that said, every single guess you have made here is completely incorrect and not based in facts at all.
literally you have no idea what you're talking about! but don't let that stop you from having an opinion
Please keep in mind that Brandolini's law exists, and so does a whole arsenal of stuff like the Gish Gallop.
Also, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and here, the extraordinary comes from that blogpost's claim, as the developers saying "yes the software we made is actually broken" is not extraordinary.