I agree. But it is how it works.
That's the difference between theory and practice. In theory, there is no difference.
> You still seem to not understand the problem.
You seem to make assumptions about what I understand and what I don't. It's presumptive but it would be silly to try to argue about this.
The problems we have no with AI generated code are an extension of the same problem that was always there.
- How do people that have to make decisions get enough of an understanding and context to make good decisions.
- Who is accountable for things.
You're arguing that since now AI is generating code, something changed fundamentally. I am arguing that it's more of the same. The pace changed, and people have to react to make sure that we can continue to control things, but the problems are the same.
- Now, we can't ask people about the code but have to ask machines about it.
- As before management and "the company" are responsible in theory. In practice, courts (through fines) and insurance companies (through higher premiums) are the ones who enforce that accountability via financial pressure.