Ok do you want to share any interesting ideas the method produced?
The idea is to allocate academic reviewer time based on the estimated quality of a submitted paper. But critically, you should maintain uncertainty bounds in your estimate. It's kind of like an UCB (upper confidence bound) bandit approach but inspired by cascaded speech translation (where you really should not throw away information at any point in your pipeline).
Recommendation: rig up the mcp and have claude or codex trawl the corpus for the kinds of ideas you might care about.
``` claude mcp add --scope user lacuna-research -- uvx lacuna-research-mcp ```
or
``` codex mcp add lacuna-research -- uvx lacuna-research-mcp ```