They approve your code, gold, if not; back to the coding machine and minus 1000 human tokens. This will be done via the implants of brain chips
You're forced to write syntax that appeases the tester. If they are not happy you need to return and rewrite.
As software engineering matures, we're adding more linting and static checkers in codebases. This is generally considered good.
that's called the write/compile/check loop
but if suddenly it's ai, people freakout at having to do this?
Also an AI is not a compiler, stop saying that.
Transformer models can transform natural language to another target language.
That’s the commonality. What’s the distinction you want to make?
Human output is not reproducible either. I take it your argument is that we should remove humans from the loop, then?
No? In that case, you have some reconciliation to do.