The introduction seems human written, but the slightly technical bits after that are clearly AI written, which makes sense, since the system that's being described was written by AI as well.
Criticize the content, not the means of creation.
Attack the substance of the criticism, not the form.
What substance?
AI wrote the article
Honestly do not care that the words are vaguely AI tinted. The semantic content is not AI, it's not slop.
Put it this way: would you rather this article didn't exist, or had less detail? Because that's the alternative in many cases.
It is a pretty good article. If AI wrote it then good for AI.
If it was so good, why do you have nothing to say about the content?