> It is hard to do even sitting on a planet (even impossible) -- there are minute differences in gravity and acceleration between any two points, so time flows with different speeds. And it changes all the time.
You can pick reference spot(s) and get it good enough.
> Note we're not talking about "below a millisecond" or below any other time range (second, minute, month). We're talking about _exactly_.
Ah, but we're not talking about exactly. Even when you're going for maximum accuracy, timestamps aren't generated at a particular instant. The gates in the computer coalesce over a cycle or two, if not longer. If you sync down to roughly the nanosecond, you hit max accuracy for CPU timestamps.
Though again, what's wrong with two CPUs that are n light-seconds apart having clocks that differ by at most n/10 seconds? You can't actually prove they aren't synchronized exactly, because of relativity.