He clearly does not conduct himself as a lawyer or present sound legal conclusions or arguments on his channel (despite presumably knowing better), as evidenced by the fact that everyone else in "lawtube" disagrees with him constantly.
The specific legal arguments made in this video are hedged and sober. For example, Stone doesn't play to popular sentiments about expansive EULAs — he notes that the liability for listening devices like LG TVs is at most limited to guests and others who haven't consented to being recorded by clicking on the EULA agreement.