Comment by iamnotsureok | Hacker News Reader

Comment by iamnotsureok | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

My wife is not a developer at all but is highly analytical. I find her a better software architect than most developers I met.

I suspect there are a lot of people really good at “systems” - there are a lot of really clever folks out there - that did not go through the proper CS rituals and are thus shunned but in fact can take over your job in no time especially with AI.

My wife regularly gets pushed away by “IT” at her work and unlike others she pushes back, but they don’t like her. They start talking about db clustering details etc as if that has any bearing on anything. I am a dev, I know she doesn’t know what logical replication is, but I do know she can replace their team. She just needs one technical person to keep an eye on things.

I suspect we will end up with just a handful of building blocks like “this is how data is siloed, secured etc”, “this is how dashboards are made here”, “this is how email is handled”, etc and employees with AI just develop their own stuff on top of these. The “devs” just oversee the building blocks and the overall soundness of the flow. Don’t know how many you need once that is standardized..

I think you may be slightly biased about your wife's ability to replace an entire IT team with no technical knowledge, no offence.

We're going through a very unique, fast-paced transition and the problem is mostly cultural/psychological IMO

People react before they've had the time to really process it, and show a lot about their existing thought processes

Many technical people IMO fetishize technology and processes, disagreeable-but-right authority justified by their willingness to work on things that most people find hard or just don't want to do. Computers can be a vessel for identity and self-worth - it's alluring to think of technology (and ourselves) as intrinsically valuable. A surprisingly large contingent seems to see work as necessarily zero-sum and adversarial, and make it a core part of their identity (and often not even particularly abnormally powerful or better for it) - like what even is the archetype there?

People like your wife are the ones writing crazy excel spreadsheets and VB6 macros, and making decisions about enterprise IT products, and solving problems with computers! They're actually probably more knowledgeable about "what is a useful and valuable way to use computers" than the ones who find computers fun and freeing and Just Want to Code.

Algorithms will dole out as much outrage as you can take but at the end of the day, doing stuff with computers that people want to pay for - usually, automating or securing things - is why people pay us!

One framing is people overindex on Being a certain kind of person or (the archetype they aspire to or identify with, that is valuable in a passive sense), over Becoming or Doing what's necessary for their work to be valuable (actively helping people, and stuff that's not fun). Very normal to feel grief and not want life to feel so uncertain, but it was literally always uncertain! Life isn't over because the business people at your IT job want to build software!

You have some great insight in this thread, I hope people absorb it.

>My wife regularly gets pushed away by “IT” at her work and unlike others she pushes back, but they don’t like her.

IT (and developers) have always been gatekeepers at their business. It's a meme, a stereotype. And it's why they are absolutely melting down about AI; you can see it up and down this thread. They don't understand people want to work with people they like, first and foremost. And it's why normies can't wait to replace them.

> "And it's why they are absolutely melting down about AI; you can see it up and down this thread."

Link to some of those comments? Should be easy if there are that many.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com