Pre-emptively announcing the existence of an opposing view doesn't invalidate it.
One minute after your comment, as it turns out.
The comment you mean was posted the minute, your comment was posted.
Coincidence? I think not.
>I wonder how soon someone will leave a comment here saying something like, “Aaactually, this isn’t censorship.”
Is there something wrong with commenting that factual statement? This is objectively not censorship.
Here you go )
There facts go )
You guys do everything in your power just to avoid calling a spade a spade. What you call “facts” is really just juggling terminology and devaluing meanings. Honestly, I just don't understand what's stopping you from simply admitting that you just like censorship - that's a valid point, and I can respect that. So why don't you just say so? Huh?