I really resonate with this since we do pretty much the same thing. If the same notes keep coming up during reviews, a human defines a single design rule, documents that call, and carries it over to the next round.
Such as "intent.md"! search it
Such as "intent.md"! search it
For "intent.md" — the name is already a good omen :) but do you mean:
- https://www.intentdocs.com/intent-md
- https://academy.claude.com/courses/ai-native-sdlc-playbook/c...
- something else?
And yes, and the idea here is: Why wait until the threshold of "same notes keep coming up" (twice? thrice? four times? more? is this fixed or is there a cognitive load of having to call time)? Why require a conscious identification of this decision as more momentous.
For several people here, there is this idea that there are some decisions that deserve recordings, other not, but the cost of deciding what to record is high. And actually the specifications that seem of lesser value can turn out surprisingly, ahem, can I say "load-bearing"?