Why can every country be "proud of their culture" and "want to conserve their culture" except white/christian countries?
Why is black-pride, or gay-pride, or african-pride, or XYZ-pride all very acceptable, except white-pride and christian-pride? The pushed narrative is obvious to me.
Well Islam isn't a popular grocery store chain or something, so what you're really asking is,
> Are people allowed to not want Muslim people in their home town?
And yeah, you are allowed to want anything, but it does make you a bigot. And the opposite isn't happening, either; no cities are out there trying to ban Christians.
And no one has an issue with European countries being proud of their cultures, but culture is a set of practices and traditions, and "being white", or "being Christian" is not one of those.
Wanting to deny freedom of religion (or worse, being opposed to certain skin colors) under the guise of 'culture' is once again the kind of thing you're free to do, but also the kind of thing other people are free to consider you shitty and bad for. No one has to accept your bigotry just because you dress it up as, "it's a tradition in my hometown not to be Muslim, and not to be non-caucasian".
> except white-pride and christian-pride?
Show me anyone saying being proud of being Christian is wrong. I'll wait.
And "white pride" is a problem for multiple reasons, one of which is that it's poisoned as a term by it's use by literal neo-Nazi and white-nationalist* groups. But also because "white" isn't actually a single group, it's many many unrelated groups with no common culture, meaning the only shared attribute is the general skin color, which is why the reality is it's just racism. A Siberian yak-herder has absolutely zero cultural relation to a British plumber, yet somehow we're supposed to buy the idea that this group has one unified cultural pride? Please.
And your position is literally the bread-and-butter of the Trump administration and it's right-wing media backers, not some downtrodden viewpoint, and yet somehow you think you're oppressed? The pushed narrative is obvious to me.
I'm saying you are not a bigot if you want these things: it's fine. Actually saying you are a bigot for not wanting mass-immigration of 3rd world conservative muslim immigrants is the problem: we are told you cannot have this opinion. Though every other culture in the world can/should "stand up for itself", the whites of europe should just quietly be diminished. Suicidal tolerance this is called.
So I'm against freedom of religion: if free speech/expression and freedom of congregation are not enough for your religion, then your religion may be illegal. That's good. Currently there are people that cut into the genitals of minors and that's protected by "freedom of religion": that's just horrible. Cutting into genitals or minors is a sex-crime and should be punished heavily. But we cannot because "religion".
I live in a western european town's neighborhood that's not white anymore: it's now muslim majority. You may have ideas about me, but I'm a student of the Quran myself: i'm not a typical Trumpy as you insinuated. But I dont hate on people that think mass-immigration of 3rd world muslims into my hood was a bad idea. It was a bad idea: everyone knows it. Even the immigrants want it too stop because they see shit gets worse every year: more dirty, more noisy, more 3rd world, more conservative, less european, more african.